The AI Litigation Platform
The best-prepared lawyer in the room.
Every document read. Every issue and witness mapped. In minutes.
The production.
Reads every document.
Maps all the evidence to issues and witnesses.
Identifies key evidence they never produced.
Built on the judgment of litigators with billions in outcomes.
This is very, very good. Better than any deposition taken in the case.
This is what attorneys should be doing but aren't.
From the first document to trial.
Great litigation is not a workflow. It is a thousand judgments. Falco brings a litigator's judgment to every one of them, without being prompted.
- DiscoveryThe case, mapped.
- DepositionsPrepared for you, before you start.
- Trial prepA running start on trial.
The difference
Other tools return work to do.Falco returns the work, done.
eDiscovery ranks the pile and hands you months of reading. An assistant answers only what you think to ask. A drafting tool waits for you to type in the strategy.
Falco reads everything and maps the evidence to every issue and witness. The map comes back assembled.
Search and reviewMonths
Some of the documents, in no order, and no way to know which are missing.
FalcoMinutes
The evidence that proves the case, in order, and the evidence that was never produced.
Documents that decide the caseNever produced
Discovery
eDiscovery, solved. In months minutes.
The other side hands you the production and you do not know where to start. Falco reads all of it, finds the few documents that decide the case, and names what should be in there and is not.
Issues found 19
- Notice and knowledge412 · 3 disputes
- General causation388
- Duty to warn274 · 2 disputes
- Regulatory reporting196
- Punitive damages143
- + 14 more
Notice and knowledge412 relevant · 3 contradict · 1 never produced
- RE: North well field, Q3 samplingDetections above the internal action level
- Tox_Screen_Summary_1998.pdfInternal screen flagged liver effects
- EHS_Notification_Protocol_v6.docxNotice required within thirty days
- Bay 4 lab notebooks, 1996-1999Never produced by Veldane
+ 408 more, ranked by relevance
What Falco did
- Read all 94,317 documents, cover to cover
- Found all 19 issues in the case, pleaded or not
- Mapped every relevant document to its issue
- Tagged each document with its witnesses
- Flagged the documents that contradict each other
- Caught what is missing from their production
Falco finds the sequences that prove the case.
Finding this yourself means reading all three, noticing that not one of them says anything on its own, and working out what they mean together. Falco reads them against each other and shows you the chain.
- Tox_Screen_Summary_1998.pdfA routine internal screen. Draws no conclusion.Dated 1998
- EHS_Notification_Protocol_v6.docxStandard policy language. Names no chemical.Adopted 2001, sets the reporting threshold
- RE: North well field, Q3 samplingFour numbers in a table.Three of the four are above that threshold
The 1998 screen predates the protocol by three years. The Q3 numbers exceed the level that protocol requires be reported. No report was filed.
Falco found this combination unprompted, and cited all three.
- Bay 4 lab notebooks, 1996-1999Referenced by name in 14 produced documents. Never produced.
- Q4 1998 sampling roundQ3 1998 and Q1 1999 were produced. The quarter between them is absent.
- Attachment to the 1998 screenThe cover memo names an attachment. No attachment was produced.
Falco drafted the deficiency letter, with all three requests cited.
The documents you did not know to ask for.
Falco reads what was produced, works out what should exist alongside it, and tells you what never arrived.
Your deposition is already written.
Each outline is built from the documents Falco mapped to that witness. You walk in ready. No all-nighter.
Depositions
Prepared for you, before you start.
Outline, prep, and a live second chair, all from the same documents and witnesses Falco mapped in discovery.
- FoundationWho had authority to set an action level at the North well field?
- FoundationWalk me through what happens when a sample exceeds one.
- Build on itYour protocol requires notice within thirty days, correct?Ex. 12 · p.4
- Build on itThe 1998 tox screen carries your initials, correct?Ex. 8
- Lock it downSo Veldane held these results eleven years before the first notice?Locks the goal
- Lock it downAnd the Bay 4 notebooks that would show the earlier runs were never produced, correct?RFP 12
Also prepared
Falco built an outline for every deponent in the case.
- M. Torres
- R. Vance
- + 11 more deponents
Live Depo ModeA second chair that catches what one person cannot track alone.
Q.Who set the action level for the North well field?
A.I don't specifically recall being involved in setting that number.
InconsistencyConflicts with 00:14:22: “no threshold moves without my sign-off.”Follow-upSo a change to that action level would have crossed your desk, correct?Q.Did you review the 1998 tox screen before the notification decision?
A.We follow a careful, consistent review process. Everything runs through the Bay 4 notebooks.
EvasionReads evasive. She answers with the process, never whether she read the screen.Pin downDid you personally read the 1998 screen before the decision, yes or no?- Document never producedThe witness just named a document that is not in their production: the Bay 4 lab notebooks. Nothing matching them was produced.
Inconsistency
Flags testimony that conflicts with the witness's prior words, timestamp included.
Follow-up
Drafts the next question while you are still listening.
Evasion
Catches a dodge and shows what the record has against it.
Pin down
Hands you the question that closes the door.
New document
Reads an exhibit the moment it is handed to you, and catches one the witness names that was never produced.
Admission
Locks in the answer that advances your theory.
Trial prep
A running start on trial.
From the discovery record and the testimony you already have.
Disputed and undisputed facts
Every fact, split by what is genuinely in dispute. Each one cited.
Case timeline
Every event in the record on one chronology, with disputes flagged.
Document sets that prove the case together
No single document proves the point. Falco finds the set that does: emails, a policy, and a signature that mean nothing apart and everything together.
Evidence of damages
The documents that quantify the harm: usage, sales, revenue. So your assessment is grounded, not guessed.
Veldane discharged to the Cold Spring aquifer until 2009.Ex. 12 · p.4
The 1998 internal screen flagged liver effects.Ex. 8
Residents were first notified in 2009.Ex. 21
The Bay 4 notebooks were never produced.RFP 12
Whether the action level was ever formally set.Dep. 43:12 · Ex. 13
Whether the 1998 screen reached management.Dep. 43:37 · Ex. 8
When the plume reached the North well field.Dep. 42:15 · Ex. 7
Whether the discharge caused plaintiffs' injuries.Dep. 42:58 · Ex. 12
- 1996
Bay 4 begins fluorosurfactant runsEx. 4
- 1998
Internal tox screen flags liver effectsKeyEx. 8
- 2001
Notification protocol adopted, thirty-day ruleEx. 12
- 2004
North well field exceeds the action levelKeyEx. 7
- 2007
Sampling program narrowed to two wellsDisputed
- 2009
Discharge ends; residents notifiedEx. 21
- 2016
State issues a drinking water advisoryEx. 30
- 2019
Bay 4 notebooks requested, never producedNot produced
Coverage is not the test. Judgment is.
Attorneys can use 95% of Falco's outline as written.
Can you train my associates to do this until this is ready?
The rest of the platform.
Discovery
- Every document mapped to issues and witnesses
- Disputes and contradictions
- Corroborating documents
- Document sets that prove the case together
- Discovery requests
- Deficiency letters
- Evidence of damages
- Case timeline
- Ask Falco about the case
Depositions
- Outlines for 30(b)(6), fact, and expert witnesses
- Client and witness prep
- Live Depo Mode
- Cross-transcript insights and analysis
- Disputed and undisputed facts
- Post-deposition reports
Built for privileged work.
Falco listens in the room where privilege lives. The controls are a feature, not fine print.
Trust center- No training on your data
- Encrypted · TLS 1.3 in transit, AES-256 at rest
- Multi-tenant isolation
- US data residency
- Role-based access control with audit logging
- Delete on request
Very cool. I want to deploy this with our litigation team.
See it run on your case.
Bring a matter you are working. We will map the discovery, build the deposition, and run Live Depo Mode on your record.
Built for every matter a litigation team runs. Boutique to AmLaw.